The Study of the History and Method of Sociology of Art

艺术社会学的历史与方法研究

• 批准号: 02451024
• 负责人: TOKUNAGA Makoto
• 金额: $ 1.92万
• 依托单位: Osaka University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 1990
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1990 至 1991
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-02451024/
• 关键词: Aesthetics; Marxist; Expressionism; Mass-culture; Mimesis; Frankfurt school; Sociology; フランクフルト学派; 物神性; 複製芸術; 非同一性; 同一性; 映画; ジャズ; 自律性; アウラ; 近代(モデルネ); コミュニケ-ション; 啓蒙

The task of "Sociology of Art" is the clarification of the relation between Art and Society. Marxist aesthetics give us an original sample of the Sociology of Art. But in order to explain the dynamic structure of the relation between Art and Society, we should refuse the native "Reflexion theory" . In this point of view the major aesthetic debate, for example, the conflict between Ernst Broch and Georg Lukacs over expressionism and the controversy Adorno's with W. Benjamin over mass-culture, forms the most revealing episodes in modern aesthetic letters. By the further examination of many issues in this debate, we can get the methodological foundation and many basic conceptions of sociology of art. Above all important for Adorno was the relation of the logic of not-identity and the conception of mimesis. His radical criticism against mass-culture is based on this standpoint. It suggests us the possibility of critical sociology of art. The final aspect of the contemporary situation relevant to our subject has to do with Habermas's communicative turn that has taken place within Frankfurt school itself. But it made to stay in future as our task.

“艺术社会学”的任务是澄清艺术与社会之间的关系。马克思主义美学为我们提供了艺术社会学的原始样本。但是，为了解释艺术与社会之间关系的动态结构，我们应该拒绝当地的“反射理论”。在这个角度，例如，主要的审美辩论，例如，恩斯特·布鲁奇（Ernst Broch）和乔治·卢卡克斯（Georg Lukacs）在表现主义方面的冲突以及与大众文化有关的争议adorno的冲突，构成了现代美学字母中最揭示的情节。通过进一步研究本辩论中的许多问题，我们可以获得方法论基础和许多艺术社会学的基本概念。最重要的是，对于阿多诺来说，重要的是非身份逻辑的关系和模仿的概念。他对大众文化的激进批评是基于这个角度。它向我们提出了批判性艺术社会学的可能性。与我们主题相关的当代状况的最后一个方面与哈贝马斯本身发生的Habermas的交流转弯有关。但这使将来成为我们的任务。

项目成果

徳永 恂: "天使と小人ーベンヤミン小考ー" 東北哲学会年報. 7. 43-48 (1991)

德永常：《天使与小矮人——本杰明的简短思考》东北哲学会年报7. 43-48（1991）。

Makoto Tokunaga: "Dwarf and Angel-Benjamins Concept of History" The Philosophy : Annual Review of the philosophical Association of Japan. 41. 1-14 (1991)

德永诚：《侏儒与天使-本杰明的历史观》哲学：日本哲学协会年度回顾。

ホルクハイマ- アドルノ 徳永 恂訳: "啓蒙の弁証法" 岩波書店, 422 (1990)

德永刚译霍克海默·阿多诺：《启蒙辩证法》《岩波书店》，422（1990）

Atsuko Miyata: "Rorbert Elias" Misuzu. 369. 11-28 (1991)

宫田敦子：“罗伯特·埃利亚斯”美铃。

Makoto Tokunaga: "Angel and Dwarf-Study of W. Benjamin" The Proceedings of the Tohoku Philosophical Association. 7. 43-48 (1991)

德永诚：《天使与矮人——本杰明的研究》东北哲学会会议录。