Collaborative Research: Should Regulators Have Independence from Political Pressures? Politics, Banking, and Bankruptcies During the Progressive Era, 1890s to 1920s
合作研究:监管机构是否应该独立于政治压力?
基本信息
- 批准号:2214557
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 15.84万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:Standard Grant
- 财政年份:2022
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2022-09-01 至 2024-08-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
Should government regulators, particularly those that supervise financial institutions, be subject to the whims of politicians, who might demand actions in their personal or partisan interests, or should regulators operate independent of politicians in the short run? Independent regulators are appointed by politicians to accomplish tasks defined by legislatures but can only be fired for “good cause,” which means that the regulators serve their terms in office as long as they fulfill their duties and do not violate the law. Today, regulatory independence is the norm. It forms a cornerstone of the financial system. All federal agencies that regulate banks, like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Reserve System, operate independently. Questions, however, have been raised about the effectiveness and constitutionality of regulatory independence. The effectiveness of regulatory independence is difficult to study today. So, we study historical analogies, particularly during the Progressive Era, when U.S. state governments experimented with the structure of regulatory agencies and transitioned from politically independent to politically dependent regulators. To assess the impact of these political experiments, we gather new data that will allow scholars to better understand the history of the Progressive Era and the impact of government intervention on the financial system and rest of the economy.This research will examine how political control of bank supervision affected financial institutions and firms, and how financial and political instability contributed to the spread of political polarization during the Progressive Era. To answer these questions, the project will build a new dataset on business and bank foundation and failure rates by state and quarter from the 1890s through the 1930s as well as the aggregate liabilities and assets of these institutions. The project will also build a new dataset on the structure of financial regulation in the 50 states. This information will be merged with existing data on politics, political structures, voting by the public and political representatives, and the state of the national and local economies. The new dataset will advance knowledge of the Progressive Era, lifting a veil on relationships between economics and politics that existing data obscures. The data will also advance knowledge related to current policy debates, particularly the optimal design of institutions regulating financial institutions.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
政府监管机构,特别是那些监管金融机构的监管机构,是否应该受制于政治家的突发奇想,因为政治家可能会要求出于个人或党派利益采取行动,或者监管机构是否应该在短期内独立于政治家运作?独立监管机构是否应该由政治家任命来完成?立法机关规定的任务,但只有在“正当理由”的情况下才能被解雇,这意味着监管机构只要履行职责且不违反法律,就可以任职。如今,监管独立已成为常态。都是金融体系的基石。然而,监管银行的联邦机构,如联邦存款保险公司和联邦储备系统,都独立运作,但人们对监管独立性的有效性和合宪性提出了质疑。因此,我们今天很难研究监管独立性的有效性。研究历史类比,特别是在进步时代,当时美国各州政府尝试了监管机构的结构,并从政治独立的监管机构转变为政治依赖的监管机构。为了评估这些政治实验的影响,我们收集了新的数据,使学者们能够更好地进行分析。了解的历史进步时代以及政府干预对金融体系和其他经济领域的影响。本研究将探讨银行监管的政治控制如何影响金融机构和企业,以及进步时代金融和政治不稳定如何导致政治两极分化的蔓延为了回答这些问题,该项目将建立一个关于 1890 年代至 1930 年代各州和季度的企业和银行基础、失败率以及这些机构的总负债和资产的新数据集。新数据集该信息将与有关政治、政治结构、公众和政治代表投票以及国家和地方经济状况的现有数据合并。进步时代,揭开了现有数据所掩盖的经济与政治之间关系的面纱。这些数据还将推进与当前政策辩论相关的知识,特别是金融机构监管机构的优化设计。该奖项的法定使命,并被认为值得支持。通过评估使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查标准。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Marco Antonio Martinez del Angel其他文献
Marco Antonio Martinez del Angel的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
相似国自然基金
基于FRET受体上升时间的单分子高精度测量方法研究
- 批准号:22304184
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
脂质多聚复合物mRNA纳米疫苗的构筑及抗肿瘤治疗研究
- 批准号:52373161
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:50 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
屏障突破型原位线粒体基因递送系统用于治疗Leber遗传性视神经病变的研究
- 批准号:82304416
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
细胞硬度介导口腔鳞癌细胞与CD8+T细胞间力学对话调控免疫杀伤的机制研究
- 批准号:82373255
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:48 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
乙酸钙不动杆菌上调DUOX2激活PERK/ATF4内质网应激在炎症性肠病中的作用机制研究
- 批准号:82300623
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
相似海外基金
Why Should I Worry About Preventing Falls? Investigating The Latest Breakthroughs in Fall Prevention Research in New Brunswick and Beyond!
为什么我应该担心预防跌倒?
- 批准号:
485650 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 15.84万 - 项目类别:
Miscellaneous Programs
Collaborative Research: Should Regulators Have Independence from Political Pressures? Politics, Banking, and Bankruptcies During the Progressive Era, 1890s to 1920s
合作研究:监管机构是否应该独立于政治压力?
- 批准号:
2214565 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 15.84万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Searching for what childcare study should be and ways of improving childcare skills through the transition of kindergartens:for connecting to education programs
探索保育研究应该是什么以及通过幼儿园转型提高保育技能的方法:与教育计划的衔接
- 批准号:
22K02402 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 15.84万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Determining if implementation of the haptoglobin phenotype biomarker should be tested in type 2 diabetes treatment planning to prevent cardiovascular disease: a biostatistical analysis, a cost-effectiveness analysis, and a patient priority analysis
确定是否应在 2 型糖尿病治疗计划中测试触珠蛋白表型生物标志物的实施以预防心血管疾病:生物统计分析、成本效益分析和患者优先分析
- 批准号:
458643 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 15.84万 - 项目类别:
Studentship Programs
Collaborative Research: Should I Stay or Should I Go? Understanding the Retention of Latinx in Engineering Jobs
合作研究:我应该留下还是应该走?
- 批准号:
2000636 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 15.84万 - 项目类别:
Continuing Grant