Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Benefit Disclosure in Financial Choices Online and Field Experiments
经济学博士论文研究:在线金融选择和现场实验中的利益披露
基本信息
- 批准号:1919483
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 3.8万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:Standard Grant
- 财政年份:2019
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2019-08-01 至 2020-07-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
Innovations in consumer finance offering consumers choices in financial products have not increased consumers' ability to take advantage of these choices. Surveys show low financial literacy rates among US adults, resulting in financial mistakes that hurt consumers' financial well-being. Financial education to improve financial literacy have failed because of the false assumption that consumers are aware of the benefits of learning to make financial choices. This research project will use experimental methods to study how information on the benefits of financial education affects consumers' financial decision making. Specifically, it addresses three questions: (i) Are consumers aware of the benefits of learning? (ii) how does awareness (or lack thereof) affect financial decisions?, and (iii) How can policy-makers complement consumers' awareness using benefit disclosure with financial education to improve financial well-being? The results of this research will provide inputs into financial decision making, which will lead to efficient financial decision making, increased savings and investment, hence economic growth.This research proposal will investigate how benefit disclosure affect consumers' financial decision making. The project first proposes a simple theoretical framework incorporating the cost of incentive perception to complement the standard costly-thinking approach. The project then tests the predictions from this framework in two experiments. The first experiment tests the precise mechanisms using incentivized choices in hypothetical controlled scenarios. This experiment manipulates three aspects of the decision environment independently: incentive levels, information about incentives, and education. While the first two variations are aimed directly at understanding the cost of incentive perception, the education treatment both links this project to existing research and more importantly, allows a test of the potential complementarity of the two information interventions. The second experiment focuses on information about incentives and education in a randomized control trial conducted. These two variations allow an investigation into the applicability of benefit disclosure and education, which are policies derived from the framework, in affecting naturalistic choices. This results of this research will improve financial decision making, increase savings and investment and economic growth.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
消费者金融的创新为消费者选择中的选择并没有提高消费者利用这些选择的能力。调查显示,美国成年人的财务素养率低,导致财务错误损害了消费者的财务状况。 由于消费者意识到学习做出财务选择的好处的错误假设是错误的假设,金融教育以提高金融素养失败。 该研究项目将使用实验方法来研究有关金融教育收益的信息如何影响消费者的财务决策。 具体来说,它解决了三个问题:(i)消费者知道学习的好处吗? (ii)意识(或缺乏意识)如何影响财务决策?和(iii)政策制定者如何使用福利披露与金融教育相辅相成,以改善金融福祉? 这项研究的结果将提供对财务决策的投入,这将导致有效的财务决策,增加储蓄和投资,因此经济增长。这项研究建议将调查利益披露如何影响消费者的财务决策。 该项目首先提出了一个简单的理论框架,该框架结合了激励感的成本,以补充标准的昂贵思维方法。然后,该项目在两个实验中测试了该框架的预测。第一个实验在假设受控方案中使用激励选择来测试精确的机制。该实验独立操纵决策环境的三个方面:激励水平,有关激励措施和教育的信息。虽然前两个变体旨在直接了解激励感的成本,但教育治疗既将该项目与现有研究联系起来,更重要的是,可以测试两种信息干预措施的潜在互补性。第二个实验重点介绍了进行的随机控制试验中有关激励和教育的信息。这两种变化允许对利益披露和教育的适用性进行调查,这是从框架中得出的政策,影响自然主义选择。 这项研究的结果将改善财务决策,增加储蓄,投资和经济增长。该奖项反映了NSF的法定任务,并被认为是值得通过基金会的知识分子优点和更广泛的影响评估标准来评估值得支持的。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Mark Dean其他文献
Axiomatic Methods, Dopamine and Reward Prediction Error This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited Advantages of the Axiomatic Approach
公理化方法、多巴胺和奖励预测错误这篇评论来自认知神经科学主题期刊编辑公理化方法的优点
- DOI:
10.1109/cdc.2008.4739083 - 发表时间:
2008 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Andrew Caplin;Mark Dean;Dean;Mark;Read Montague;John Assad - 通讯作者:
John Assad
Discriminating faunal assemblages and their palaeoecology based on museum collections: the Carboniferous Hurlet and Index limestones of western Scotland
根据博物馆藏品区分动物群落及其古生态:苏格兰西部的石炭纪 Hurlet 和 Index 石灰岩
- DOI:
10.1144/0036-9276/01-399 - 发表时间:
2010 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Mark Dean;A. Owen;A. Bowdler;M. Akhurst - 通讯作者:
M. Akhurst
Objective Lotteries as Ambiguous Objects: Allais, Ellsberg, and Hedging Social Science Working Paper 1356 Preliminary and Incomplete
作为模糊对象的客观彩票:阿莱、埃尔斯伯格和对冲社会科学工作论文 1356 初步且不完整
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Mark Dean;Pietro Ortoleva;Hedging Allais - 通讯作者:
Hedging Allais
Investigating the association between blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a data linkage approach to Patient Blood Management.
研究急性冠状动脉综合征患者输血与临床结果之间的关联:患者血液管理的数据链接方法。
- DOI:
10.2450/2020.0174-20 - 发表时间:
2020 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
G. Franco;Julie Li;Ling Li;Mark Dean;G. Shalaby;A. Georgiou - 通讯作者:
A. Georgiou
Caution and Reference Effects *
注意事项及参考效果*
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
†. SimoneCerreia;‡. DavidDillenberger;§. PietroOrtoleva;Roland Bénabou;Han Bleichrodt;James Choi;Roberto Corrao;Mark Dean;Stefano Dellavigna;Ozgur Evren;Faruk Gul;Ryota Iijima;Alex Imas;Giacomo Lanzani;Massimo Marinacci;Efe Ok;W. Pesendorfer;Rani Spiegler;Richard H Thaler;Lise Vesterlund;N. Gennaioli;Peter Wakker - 通讯作者:
Peter Wakker
Mark Dean的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Mark Dean', 18)}}的其他基金
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Belief Formation and Choice in Games: An Experiment
经济学博士论文研究:博弈中的信念形成与选择:一个实验
- 批准号:
1949395 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Determinants of Health Care Decisions: Children's Health in Mali
医疗保健决策的决定因素:马里儿童的健康
- 批准号:
ES/K01207X/1 - 财政年份:2013
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Collaborative Research: Understanding the Connections Between Economic Behaviors
合作研究:了解经济行为之间的联系
- 批准号:
1156090 - 财政年份:2012
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
相似国自然基金
细粒度与个性化的学生议论文评价方法研究
- 批准号:62306145
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
基于社交媒体用户画像的科学论文传播模式与影响力性质研究
- 批准号:72304274
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
基于科学论文论证结构的可循证领域知识体系构建研究
- 批准号:72304137
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
面向论文引用与科研合作的"科学学"规律中的国别特征研究
- 批准号:72374173
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:41 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
基于深度语义理解的生物医学论文临床转化分析研究
- 批准号:72204090
- 批准年份:2022
- 资助金额:30.00 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
相似海外基金
Doctoral Dissertation Research: How New Legal Doctrine Shapes Human-Environment Relations
博士论文研究:新法律学说如何塑造人类与环境的关系
- 批准号:
2315219 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Determinants of social meaning
博士论文研究:社会意义的决定因素
- 批准号:
2336572 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Assessing the chewing function of the hyoid bone and the suprahyoid muscles in primates
博士论文研究:评估灵长类动物舌骨和舌骨上肌的咀嚼功能
- 批准号:
2337428 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Aspect and Event Cognition in the Acquisition and Processing of a Second Language
博士论文研究:第二语言习得和处理中的方面和事件认知
- 批准号:
2337763 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Renewable Energy Transition and Economic Growth
博士论文研究:可再生能源转型与经济增长
- 批准号:
2342813 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 3.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant