Contested resource inputs to science: How institutional provisions on the access and use of materials and data affect research collaboration structures and outcomes

对科学的有争议的资源投入：有关材料和数据的获取和使用的制度规定如何影响研究合作结构和成果

• 批准号: 1360166
• 负责人: Eric Welch
• 金额: $ 29.94万
• 依托单位: University of Illinois at Chicago
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2014-07-01 至 2015-02-28
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1360166&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Contested; resource; inputs; science; How

Biological materials and data are important components for conducing scientific research in most fields of science in the United States and in other countries. Biological material and data are increasingly subject to national and international policies that monitor and regulate the ownership and sharing of these resources. These policies may create barriers to the advancement of science by increasing costs, reducing public access, and creating imbalances in the availability of important resources for science production. There is little systematic research investigating how these policies affect scientific research collaboration and outputs. This study investigates how the international and national rules, laws, organizations, and policies that regulate the access, use, and exchange of biological material and data affect scientific collaboration, resource flows, and science production (e.g. new knowledge, inventions). Results from this research will provide an empirical basis for national and international policy-making and implementation. The project findings will also help the science community as it seeks to manage material and data exchange in ways that facilitate collaboration, maintain high quality science, and effectively respond to policy demands.This project examines how data and material sharing and collaboration networks adapt to changing national and multinational policies. Preliminary research indicates that scientists navigating the new rules and regulatory systems make decisions about how best to exploit their existing networks to obtain biological resources and data or to identify alternative resource providers. How materials and data are shared within a scientific community depends on the attributes of the researchers' collaborators, the capacity for developing new collaborators, the value of the resources sought, exigencies placed on resources, research goals, and the capacity and willingness of scientists to access new resources. This project assesses the impact of both social exchange costs (e.g. reciprocity) and exchange transaction costs (e.g. formal agreements and contracts) on the different resource acquisition strategies of scientists across four different fields of science. The research develops testable hypotheses within a research design that applies network analysis and theory to longitudinal survey, ego network, and bibliometric data. The findings will fill a fundamental gap in the science of science policy literature by demonstrating how institutional controls affect collaboration networks and outcomes. Findings and dissemination activities will inform ongoing design and implementation of national and multinational policies and mechanisms that affect access and exchange of data and materials for high quality science and enable policy makers to better identify the levers for managing the exchange and sharing of biological materials and data to advance scientific production.

生物材料和数据是美国和其他国家大多数科学领域开展科学研究的重要组成部分。生物材料和数据越来越受到监测和管理这些资源的所有权和共享的国家和国际政策的约束。这些政策可能会增加成本、减少公众参与以及造成科学生产重要资源的不平衡，从而对科学进步造成障碍。很少有系统研究调查这些政策如何影响科学研究合作和产出。本研究调查了规范生物材料和数据的获取、使用和交换的国际和国家规则、法律、组织和政策如何影响科学合作、资源流动和科学生产（例如新知识、发明）。这项研究的结果将为国家和国际政策的制定和实施提供实证基础。该项目的研究结果还将帮助科学界寻求以促进协作、维持高质量科学和有效响应政策需求的方式管理材料和数据交换。该项目研究数据和材料共享以及协作网络如何适应不断变化的国家和跨国政策。初步研究表明，遵守新规则和监管体系的科学家会决定如何最好地利用现有网络来获取生物资源和数据或识别替代资源提供者。科学界内如何共享材料和数据取决于研究人员合作者的属性、开发新合作者的能力、所寻求资源的价值、对资源的紧迫性、研究目标以及科学家的能力和意愿。访问新资源。该项目评估了社会交换成本（例如互惠）和交换交易成本（例如正式协议和合同）对四个不同科学领域科学家不同资源获取策略的影响。该研究在研究设计中提出了可检验的假设，将网络分析和理论应用于纵向调查、自我网络和文献计量数据。这些发现将通过展示制度控制如何影响合作网络和结果，填补科学政策文献中的一个根本空白。调查结果和传播活动将为正在进行的国家和跨国政策和机制的设计和实施提供信息，这些政策和机制影响高质量科学的数据和材料的获取和交换，并使政策制定者能够更好地确定管理生物材料和数据的交换和共享的杠杆推进科学生产。