Work on Concepts. The History of Controversies within the Research Group Poetik und Hermeneutik (1966-1984)

研究概念。

• 批准号: 157166521
• 负责人: Dr. Petra Boden
• 金额: --
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2009-12-31 至 2014-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/157166521?language=en
• 关键词: Work; Concepts.; History; Controversies; within

This project examines the work of the research group POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK, which was organized as an interdisciplinary dialog and wanted to introduce a new form of practice in the humanities. Because of its interdisciplinary work that includes the international discussion, the group is credited with being largely responsible for modernizing the discourse in the humanities in Germany in the second half of the twentieth century. The project analyzes the conditions, work forms, and effects of the research group in order to check whether this communis opinio is really valid, and to explore where its limits are. An essential precondition for this is the rereading of the 17 volumes of conference papers in connection with newly available, extensive archival materials to develop the history of POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK as an exemplary case for research in the humanities. In order to clarify how theoretical interests relate to their institutional framework as well as wider politics of scholarship, the work of the research group will be examined under four aspects.(1) Using the example of controversies about conceptual history, the project will look into the conditions of the interdisciplinary dialog that led to new directions in theoryor failed to do so. (2) Essential for this is the analysis of the personal networks, communicative standards, and the constitutive rules within which this work continued for more than 30 years, ensuring the groups outstanding reputation. (3) In this context, the project asks how the process of the groups research and its results relate to the contemporary discussion in literary studies at certain points, which basically took place within the disciplinary orders of the national literatures, orders that were confirmed by the university reforms of the 1960s. A special focus will be the examination of the mutual perception and exchange between members of POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK and literature scholars at the Zentralinstitut für Literaturgeschichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR [Central Institute of Literary History at the Academy of Sciences of the GDR], which took place continuously for as long as the group existed. The project will explore whether hitherto unpublished material supports the groups view of itself as a circle that modernized the humanities in Germany, formed an influential school of followers, and caused a paradigm shift.In order to do so, for the first time, basic research on the history of the humanities, supported by extensive published and archival material, will be linked with methods of modern science studies, and the usefulness of these methods for literary studies and the humanities in general will be tested against a concrete case. The results of this research will lead to a detailed study on the history of POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK.

该项目考察了 POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK 研究小组的工作，该小组是作为跨学科对话而组织的，希望在人文学科中引入一种新的实践形式，因为其跨学科工作包括国际讨论，该小组被认为是该项目对研究小组的条件、工作形式和效果进行了研究，以检验这种共同意见是否真正有效。并探索其局限性的一个重要前提是结合新近获得的大量档案材料重新阅读 17 卷会议论文，以将《诗歌与诠释》的历史发展为人文学科研究的典范。为了阐明理论兴趣与其制度框架以及更广泛的学术政治之间的关系，研究小组的工作将从四个方面进行审查。（1）以概念史争议为例，该项目将探讨跨学科对话的条件导致理论上的新方向未能做到这一点（2）对此至关重要的是对个人网络、交流标准以及这项工作持续了 30 多年的构成规则的分析。 (3) 在此背景下，该项目询问小组研究的过程及其结果在某些方面如何与当代文学研究的讨论联系起来，这些讨论基本上是在民族文学的学科秩序内进行的，这些秩序已得到确认20 世纪 60 年代大学改革的一个特别重点是考察 POETIK UND HERMENEUTIK 成员与 DDR 中央文学史研究所的文学学者之间的相互看法和交流。该项目将探索是否存在。迄今为止未发表的材料支持该团体的观点，该团体将自己视为一个使德国人文学科现代化的圈子，形成了一个有影响力的追随者学派，并引起了范式转变。人文科学，在广泛出版和档案材料的支持下，将与现代科学研究方法联系起来，这些方法对文学研究和一般人文学科的有用性将通过具体案例进行检验。这项研究的结果将导致：对历史的详细研究诗歌与诠释学。