喵ID:KioSHB免责声明

Does Social Support Determine the Treatment Setting for Hemodialysis Patients?

基本信息

DOI:
10.1016/s0272-6386(85)80131-1
发表时间:
1985-01-01
期刊:
Research article
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Alan M. Robson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
original investigations
作者: Marc D. Smith;Barry A. Hong;Michael A. Province;Alan M. Robson研究方向: -- MeSH主题词: --
关键词: --
来源链接:pubmed详情页地址

文献摘要

The availability of an adequate system of social support has been suggested to be significant in determining whether an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient is dialyzed in a center or at home. To evaluate this hypothesis more completely, we conducted a study of social support among 257 home and center hemodialysis patients receiving maintenance therapy at four facilities in a midwestern, metropolitan area. A statistically significant difference, χ2(3) = 14.031, P = 0.0029, was observed in the percentage of patients with social support available to them across the four facilities. The distribution of patients between home and center hemodialysis at the facilities also differed significantly, χ2(3) = 14.919, P = 0.0019. An adequate social support system was present among 96.4% of the 55 home hemodialysis patients and 85.6% of the 202 center hemodialysis patients, a difference that was statistically significant, χ2(1) = 4.684, P = 0.0305. However, a more detailed analysis of these findings revealed that the presence of social support was not significant, χ2(1) = 1.080, P = 0.2995, in determining whether an ESRD patient was dialyzed at home or in a center after accounting for the facility differences. The facility differences remained significant in determining the setting of hemodialysis even after correcting for social support, χ2(3) = 10.740, P = 0.0132. We concluded, therefore, that the attitudes of clinical staff toward home and center hemodialysis and the willingness of staff to develop those resources that facilitate a specific treatment setting are the principal elements in the therapy selection process.
充足的社会支持系统的可获得性被认为在决定终末期肾病(ESRD)患者是在中心透析还是在家透析方面具有重要意义。为了更全面地评估这一假设,我们对中西部一个大都市地区的四个机构中接受维持性治疗的257名在家和在中心进行血液透析的患者的社会支持情况进行了研究。在四个机构中,有社会支持的患者百分比存在统计学上的显著差异,χ2(3)=14.031,P = 0.0029。这些机构中在家和在中心进行血液透析的患者分布也存在显著差异,χ2(3)=14.919,P = 0.0019。在55名在家血液透析患者中有96.4%以及在202名在中心血液透析患者中有85.6%拥有充足的社会支持系统,这一差异具有统计学意义,χ2(1)=4.684,P = 0.0305。然而,对这些发现进行更详细的分析表明,在考虑机构差异后,社会支持的存在对于决定ESRD患者是在家还是在中心透析并不显著,χ2(1)=1.080,P = 0.2995。即使在对社会支持进行校正后,机构差异在决定血液透析的环境方面仍然显著,χ2(3)=10.740,P = 0.0132。因此,我们得出结论,临床工作人员对在家和在中心血液透析的态度以及工作人员开发有利于特定治疗环境的资源的意愿是治疗选择过程中的主要因素。
参考文献(0)
被引文献(0)

数据更新时间:{{ references.updateTime }}

Alan M. Robson
通讯地址:
--
所属机构:
--
电子邮件地址:
--
免责声明免责声明
1、猫眼课题宝专注于为科研工作者提供省时、高效的文献资源检索和预览服务;
2、网站中的文献信息均来自公开、合规、透明的互联网文献查询网站,可以通过页面中的“来源链接”跳转数据网站。
3、在猫眼课题宝点击“求助全文”按钮,发布文献应助需求时求助者需要支付50喵币作为应助成功后的答谢给应助者,发送到用助者账户中。若文献求助失败支付的50喵币将退还至求助者账户中。所支付的喵币仅作为答谢,而不是作为文献的“购买”费用,平台也不从中收取任何费用,
4、特别提醒用户通过求助获得的文献原文仅用户个人学习使用,不得用于商业用途,否则一切风险由用户本人承担;
5、本平台尊重知识产权,如果权利所有者认为平台内容侵犯了其合法权益,可以通过本平台提供的版权投诉渠道提出投诉。一经核实,我们将立即采取措施删除/下架/断链等措施。
我已知晓