喵ID:GLvdli免责声明

Safety of Neoral conversion in maintenance renal transplant patients: A one-year, double-blind study

基本信息

DOI:
10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00599.x
发表时间:
1999-08-01
期刊:
Research article
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
on behalf of the Novartis OLN-353 Study Group
中科院分区:
文献类型:
original articles
作者: Daniel C. Brennan;Ralph Barbeito;James Burke;Kenneth Brayman;Stuart Greenstein;Tammy Chang; on behalf of the Novartis OLN-353 Study Group研究方向: -- MeSH主题词: --
来源链接:pubmed详情页地址

文献摘要

Safety of Neoral conversion in maintenance renal transplant patients: A one-year, double-blind study.Despite the improved pharmacokinetic characteristics of Neoral, some centers have encountered difficulty with the conversion of some patients from Sandimmune to Neoral and have reported precipitation of toxicity and rejection.We conducted a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter prospective study of stable maintenance renal transplant patients to compare the safety and tolerability of converting from Sandimmune to Neoral ( = 132) versus continuing Sandimmune ( = 130). Patients were studied for one year. The cyclosporine (CsA) dose was adjusted as necessary to maintain site-specific trough whole blood levels.During the study, dose adjustments were frequent in both groups: 67% Neoral versus 65% Sandimmune patients. At study completion, the mean trough CsA levels were comparable; the dose change-from-baseline did not differ statistically between groups. Fewer Neoral (87.1%) than Sandimmune (95.4%) patients reported adverse events, and serious adverse events were comparable. Adverse events related to CsA were not more common in the Neoral group. Renal function measures also implied comparability of the two treatments. Three Neoral versus five Sandimmune patients experienced acute rejection; two Neoral versus five Sandimmune patients experienced chronic graft dysfunction. Two septic deaths occurred in the Neoral group. No grafts were lost.With careful monitoring, conversion of maintenance renal transplant patients to Neoral can be safely accomplished.
新山地明转换在维持性肾移植患者中的安全性:一项为期一年的双盲研究。尽管新山地明具有更优的药代动力学特性,但一些中心在将部分患者从山地明转换为新山地明时遇到困难,并报告出现毒性反应和排斥反应。我们对病情稳定的维持性肾移植患者进行了一项随机、双盲、平行分组、多中心前瞻性研究,以比较从山地明转换为新山地明(n = 132)与继续使用山地明(n = 130)的安全性和耐受性。对患者进行了为期一年的研究。根据需要调整环孢素(CsA)剂量,以维持特定部位的全血谷浓度。在研究期间,两组都频繁调整剂量:新山地明组为67%,山地明组为65%。研究结束时,平均CsA谷浓度相当;两组间从基线起的剂量变化无统计学差异。报告不良事件的新山地明组患者(87.1%)少于山地明组(95.4%),严重不良事件相当。与CsA相关的不良事件在新山地明组并不更常见。肾功能指标也表明两种治疗方法具有可比性。新山地明组有3例患者发生急性排斥反应,山地明组有5例;新山地明组有2例患者出现慢性移植物功能障碍,山地明组有5例。新山地明组有2例患者因败血症死亡。无移植物丢失。通过仔细监测,维持性肾移植患者可安全地转换为新山地明。
参考文献(0)
被引文献(0)

数据更新时间:{{ references.updateTime }}

on behalf of the Novartis OLN-353 Study Group
通讯地址:
--
所属机构:
--
电子邮件地址:
--
免责声明免责声明
1、猫眼课题宝专注于为科研工作者提供省时、高效的文献资源检索和预览服务;
2、网站中的文献信息均来自公开、合规、透明的互联网文献查询网站,可以通过页面中的“来源链接”跳转数据网站。
3、在猫眼课题宝点击“求助全文”按钮,发布文献应助需求时求助者需要支付50喵币作为应助成功后的答谢给应助者,发送到用助者账户中。若文献求助失败支付的50喵币将退还至求助者账户中。所支付的喵币仅作为答谢,而不是作为文献的“购买”费用,平台也不从中收取任何费用,
4、特别提醒用户通过求助获得的文献原文仅用户个人学习使用,不得用于商业用途,否则一切风险由用户本人承担;
5、本平台尊重知识产权,如果权利所有者认为平台内容侵犯了其合法权益,可以通过本平台提供的版权投诉渠道提出投诉。一经核实,我们将立即采取措施删除/下架/断链等措施。
我已知晓