喵ID:7dQrsp免责声明

Look-Back and Look-Forward Durations and the Apparent Appropriateness of Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing.

基本信息

DOI:
10.3390/antibiotics11111554
发表时间:
2022-11-04
期刊:
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
Journal Article
作者: 研究方向: -- MeSH主题词: --
关键词: --
来源链接:pubmed详情页地址

文献摘要

Ambulatory antibiotic stewards, researchers, and performance measurement programs choose different durations to associate diagnoses with antibiotic prescriptions. We assessed how the apparent appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing changes when using different look-back and look-forward periods. Examining durations of 0 days (same-day), −3 days, −7 days, −30 days, ±3 days, ±7 days, and ±30 days, we classified all ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions in the electronic health record of an integrated health care system from 2016 to 2019 (714,057 prescriptions to 348,739 patients by 2391 clinicians) as chronic, appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, or not associated with any diagnosis. Overall, 16% percent of all prescriptions were classified as chronic infection related. Using only same-day diagnoses, appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, and not-associated antibiotics, accounted for 14%, 36%, 22%, and 11% of prescriptions, respectively. As the duration of association increased, the proportion of appropriate antibiotics stayed the same (range, 14% to 18%), potentially appropriate antibiotics increased (e.g., 43% for −30 days), inappropriate stayed the same (range, 22% to 24%), and not-associated antibiotics decreased (e.g., 2% for −30 days). Using the longest look-back-and-forward duration (±30 days), appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, and not-associated antibiotics, accounted for 18%, 44%, 20%, and 2% of prescriptions, respectively. Ambulatory programs and studies focused on appropriate or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing can reasonably use a short duration of association between an antibiotic prescription and diagnosis codes. Programs and studies focused on potentially appropriate antibiotic prescribing might consider examining longer durations.
门诊抗生素管理专家、研究人员以及绩效评估项目会选择不同的时长来将诊断与抗生素处方相关联。我们评估了在使用不同的回顾期和前瞻期时,抗生素处方的合理性表象如何变化。通过检查0天(当日)、−3天、−7天、−30天、±3天、±7天和±30天这些时长,我们将2016年至2019年某综合医疗保健系统电子健康记录中的所有门诊抗生素处方(2391名临床医生给348739名患者开具的714057份处方)分类为慢性、合理、可能合理、不合理或与任何诊断无关。总体而言,所有处方中有16%被归类为与慢性感染相关。仅使用当日诊断时,合理、可能合理、不合理以及与诊断无关的抗生素处方分别占14%、36%、22%和11%。随着关联时长的增加,合理抗生素的比例保持不变(范围为14% - 18%),可能合理的抗生素比例增加(例如,−30天时长时为43%),不合理的比例保持不变(范围为22% - 24%),与诊断无关的抗生素比例下降(例如,−30天时长时为2%)。使用最长的回顾和前瞻时长(±30天)时,合理、可能合理、不合理以及与诊断无关的抗生素处方分别占18%、44%、20%和2%。关注合理或不合理抗生素处方的门诊项目和研究可以合理地使用抗生素处方与诊断代码之间较短的关联时长。关注可能合理的抗生素处方的项目和研究可能需要考虑检查更长的时长。
参考文献(0)
被引文献(0)
Non-Visit-Based and Non-Infection-Related Antibiotic Use in the US: A Cohort Study of Privately Insured Patients During 2016-2018.
DOI:
10.1093/ofid/ofab412
发表时间:
2021-09
期刊:
Open forum infectious diseases
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Fischer MA;Mahesri M;Lii J;Linder JA
通讯作者:
Linder JA
Improving Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
DOI:
10.1093/cid/ciab602
发表时间:
2021-08-06
期刊:
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Dutcher, Lauren;Degnan, Kathleen;Hamilton, Keith W.
通讯作者:
Hamilton, Keith W.
Clues from the Pandora's Box: Frequency of Acute Abdominal Symptoms in COVID-19 and Its Association with Inflammatory Markers-a Cross-Sectional Study.
DOI:
10.1007/s12262-022-03550-w
发表时间:
2022-08-22
期刊:
INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
影响因子:
0.4
作者:
Madan, K.;Rudresh, H. K.;Rao, Akshay;Sandeep, S.;Monica, N.;Gupta, Anupam
通讯作者:
Gupta, Anupam
Interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate the impact of a behavioral change outpatient antibiotic stewardship intervention.
DOI:
10.1017/ash.2021.203
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE
影响因子:
0
作者:
Morgan, Brittany L;Bettencourt, Haylee;May, Larissa
通讯作者:
May, Larissa
Appropriateness of Outpatient Antibiotic Use in Seniors across Two Canadian Provinces.
DOI:
10.3390/antibiotics10121484
发表时间:
2021-12-03
期刊:
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)
影响因子:
0
作者:
Saatchi A;Reid JN;Povitz M;Shariff SZ;Silverman M;Morris AM;Reyes RC;Patrick DM;Marra F
通讯作者:
Marra F

数据更新时间:{{ references.updateTime }}

关联基金

通讯地址:
--
所属机构:
--
电子邮件地址:
--
免责声明免责声明
1、猫眼课题宝专注于为科研工作者提供省时、高效的文献资源检索和预览服务;
2、网站中的文献信息均来自公开、合规、透明的互联网文献查询网站,可以通过页面中的“来源链接”跳转数据网站。
3、在猫眼课题宝点击“求助全文”按钮,发布文献应助需求时求助者需要支付50喵币作为应助成功后的答谢给应助者,发送到用助者账户中。若文献求助失败支付的50喵币将退还至求助者账户中。所支付的喵币仅作为答谢,而不是作为文献的“购买”费用,平台也不从中收取任何费用,
4、特别提醒用户通过求助获得的文献原文仅用户个人学习使用,不得用于商业用途,否则一切风险由用户本人承担;
5、本平台尊重知识产权,如果权利所有者认为平台内容侵犯了其合法权益,可以通过本平台提供的版权投诉渠道提出投诉。一经核实,我们将立即采取措施删除/下架/断链等措施。
我已知晓