喵ID:3rbrWo免责声明

Is the cloze procedure appropriate to evaluate health literacy in older individuals? Age effects in the test of functional health literacy in adults.

基本信息

DOI:
10.1155/2014/194635
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Jacobs RJ
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
Journal Article
作者: Ownby RL;Acevedo A;Waldrop-Valverde D;Jacobs RJ研究方向: -- MeSH主题词: --
关键词: --
来源链接:pubmed详情页地址

文献摘要

Health literacy has received increasing attention because of its importance for older individuals' health, as studies have shown a close relation between older individuals' health literacy and their health. Research also suggests that older individuals have low levels of health literacy, but this finding is variable and may depend on which health literacy test is used. Older individuals assessed with the Test of Functional Health Literacy (TOFHLA) score lower than younger individuals, but a previous study suggested that this may result from age-related differential item functioning (DIF) on the TOFHLA. The study reported here assessed age-related DIF in a sample of community-dwelling volunteers. Twenty-two percent of items were differentially more difficult for older individuals independent of their overall ability, and when these items were eliminated from the total score, age differences were no longer found. Performance on a working memory task predicted older but not younger individuals' performance on the age-related items. At least part of older individuals' apparent deficits in health literacy when assessed by the TOFHLA may be related to DIF on its items. The TOFHLA, and any measure that employs the cloze procedure to evaluate reading comprehension, should be used cautiously in older individuals.
健康素养因其对老年人健康的重要性而受到越来越多的关注,因为研究表明老年人的健康素养与其健康之间存在密切关系。研究还表明老年人的健康素养水平较低,但这一发现存在差异,可能取决于所使用的健康素养测试。使用功能性健康素养测试(TOFHLA)评估时,老年人的得分低于年轻人,但先前的一项研究表明,这可能是由于TOFHLA上与年龄相关的项目功能差异(DIF)所致。此处报道的研究对社区居住志愿者样本中的与年龄相关的DIF进行了评估。22%的项目对老年人来说难度更大,且与他们的整体能力无关,当这些项目从总分中剔除时,不再发现年龄差异。工作记忆任务的表现可以预测老年人在与年龄相关项目上的表现,但不能预测年轻人的表现。当使用TOFHLA进行评估时,老年人在健康素养方面明显的缺陷至少有一部分可能与其项目上的DIF有关。在老年人中应谨慎使用TOFHLA以及任何采用完形填空程序来评估阅读理解的测试方法。
参考文献(0)
被引文献(0)

数据更新时间:{{ references.updateTime }}

关联基金

Development and Validation of a Computer-Administered Health Literacy Measure
批准号:
8464200
批准年份:
2010
资助金额:
31.94
项目类别:
Jacobs RJ
通讯地址:
--
所属机构:
--
电子邮件地址:
--
免责声明免责声明
1、猫眼课题宝专注于为科研工作者提供省时、高效的文献资源检索和预览服务;
2、网站中的文献信息均来自公开、合规、透明的互联网文献查询网站,可以通过页面中的“来源链接”跳转数据网站。
3、在猫眼课题宝点击“求助全文”按钮,发布文献应助需求时求助者需要支付50喵币作为应助成功后的答谢给应助者,发送到用助者账户中。若文献求助失败支付的50喵币将退还至求助者账户中。所支付的喵币仅作为答谢,而不是作为文献的“购买”费用,平台也不从中收取任何费用,
4、特别提醒用户通过求助获得的文献原文仅用户个人学习使用,不得用于商业用途,否则一切风险由用户本人承担;
5、本平台尊重知识产权,如果权利所有者认为平台内容侵犯了其合法权益,可以通过本平台提供的版权投诉渠道提出投诉。一经核实,我们将立即采取措施删除/下架/断链等措施。
我已知晓