喵ID:1c7vbc免责声明

The ChatGPT Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: How Well Does It Answer Accounting Assessment Questions?

ChatGPT 人工智能聊天机器人:它回答会计评估问题的能力如何?

基本信息

DOI:
10.2308/issues-2023-013
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
E.N.W. Zoet
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者: David A. Wood;M. P. Achhpilia;Mollie T. Adams;Sanaz Aghazadeh;Kazeem O. Akinyele;Mfon Akpan;Kristian D. Allee;Abigail Allen;E. D. Almer;Daniel Ames;Viktor Arity;Dereck Barr‐Pulliam;K. A. Basoglu;Andrew Belnap;Jeremiah W. Bentley;T. Berg;Nathan R. Berglund;Erica Berry;Avishek Bhandari;Md Nazmul Hasan Bhuyan;Paulette Black;Eva Blondeel;David Bond;Annika Bonrath;A. F. Borthick;E. S. Boyle;M. Bradford;D. M. Brandon;Joseph F. Brazel;Bryan G. Brockbank;Marcus Burger;Dmitri Byzalov;James N. Cannon;Cecile Q. Caro;Abraham H. Carr;Jack M. Cathey;Ryan Cating;K. Charron;Stacy Chavez;Jason Chen;Jennifer C. Chen;Jennifer W. Chen;Christine Cheng;Xu Cheng;Brant E. Christensen;K. Church;N. J. Cicone;Patience Constance;Lauren A. Cooper;Candice L. Correia;Joshua G. Coyne;W. Cram;Asher Curtis;Ronald J. Daigle;Steven Dannemiller;Stephan A. Davenport;Gregory S. Dawson;Karen J. De Meyst;Scott Dell;Sebahattin Demirkan;Christine A. Denison;Hrishikesh Desai;S. DeSimone;Lea Diehl;Ruth Dimes;Bei Dong;Amy M. Donnelly;Adam W Du Pon;H. Duan;Ada Duffey;R. Dunn;Mary P. Durkin;Ann C. Dzuranin;Rachel M. Eberle;Matthew S. Ege;Dina El Mahdy;Adam M. Esplin;Marc Eulerich;P. Everaert;Nusrat Farah;L. Farish;Michael Favere;Dutch Fayard;Jessica R. Filosa;Melinda Ford;Diana R. Franz;Bachman P. Fulmer;Sarah Fulmer;Z. Furner;Sonia Gantman;Steve Garner;Jace B. Garrett;Xin Geng;J. Golden;William Goldman;J. Gómez;M. Gooley;Shawn P. Granitto;Karen Y. Green;Cindy L. Greenman;Gaurav Gupta;Ronald N. Guymon;Kevin Hale;Christopher J. Harper;S. Hartt;Holly Hawk;S. Hawkins;E. M. Hawkins;D. Hay;Rafael Heinzelmann;Cassy D. Henderson;Bradley E. Hendricks;William G. Heninger;M. Hill;Nicole Holden;D. K. Holderness;Travis P. Holt;Jeffrey L. Hoopes;Sheng;Feiqi Huang;H. Huang;Ting‐Chiao Huang;Brian W. Huels;Kara Hunter;P. Hurley;Kerry K. Inger;Sharif Islam;Isaac Ison;H. Issa;Andrew B. Jackson;Scott C. Jackson;Diane J. Janvrin;Peggy D. Jimenez;Daniel Johanson;J. Judd;Brett S. Kawada;A. Kelton;Sara Kern;Jon N. Kerr;Marsha B. Keune;Mindy Kim;B. Knox;G. Kogan;Amr Kotb;Ronja Krane;Joleen Kremin;Kimberly S. Krieg;Jonathan Kugel;Ellen M. Kulset;C. Kuruppu;Garrison LaDuca;Barbara Lamberton;Melvin A. Lamboy;Bradley Lang;Stephannie A. Larocque;M. Larson;Bradley P. Lawson;James G. Lawson;Lorraine S. Lee;Margarita M. Lenk;Michelle Li;Jonathan T. Liljegren;Yi‐Hung Lin;Wu;Zishang Liu;Brandon Lock;James H. Long;Tina M. Loraas;Suzanne L. Lowensohn;Thomas R. Loy;Hakim Lyngstadaas;Wim Maas;J. MacGregor;D. Madsen;Carissa L. Malone;Maximilian Margolin;Mary E. Marshall;Rachel M. Martin;Colleen McClain Mpofu;Chris Mccoy;Nicholas McGuigan;D. McSwain;Michele D. Meckfessel;M. Mellon;Olivia S. Melton;Julie M. Mercado;Steven Mitsuda;K. Modugu;Stephen Moehrle;A. M. Chaghervand;Kevin C. Moffitt;J. Moon;Brigitte Muehlmann;John Murray;Emmanuel S. Mwaungulu;Noah Myers;J. Naegle;Martin J. Ndicu;Aaron S. Nelson;A. L. Nguyen;Thomas Niederkofler;Ehsan Nikbakht;Ann D. O'Brien;Kehinde Ogunade;Daniel E. O’Leary;M. Oler;Derek K. Oler;K. Olsen;J. I. Otalor;Kyle W. Outlaw;Michael E. Ozlanski;Jenny Parlier;Jeffrey S. Paterson;Christopher A. Pearson;M. J. Petersen;S. Petra;Matthew D. Pickard;Jeffrey S. Pickerd;R. Pinsker;Catherine Plante;James M. Plečnik;R. Price;Linda A. Quick;J. Raedy;Robyn L. Raschke;Julie Ravenscraft;Vernon Richardson;Brett A. Rixom;J. F. Robertson;Iyad Rock;Miles A. Romney;Andrea M. Rozario;Michael F. Ruff;Kathleen Rupley;A. Saeedi;Aaron Saiewitz;Leigh Salzsieder;Sayan Sarkar;Michael Saulls;Tialei A. Scanlan;Tammie J. Schaefer;Daniel Schaupp;Gary P. Schneider;A. Seebeck;R. Sellers;Samantha C. Seto;Romi;Yuxin Shan;Matthew G. Sherwood;Maggie Singorahardjo;H. Skaftadottir;Justyna Skomra;Jason L. Smith;Dallin O. Smith;James Smith;Mason C. Snow;Ryan D. Sommerfeldt;Kate B. Sorensen;Trevor L. Sorensen;Andrew C. Spieler;Matthew A. Stallings;Lesya Stallings;A. Stancill;Jonathan D. Stanley;Chad M. Stefaniak;Nathaniel M Stephens;Bryan W. Stewart;Theophanis C. Stratopoulos;Daniel A. Street;Meena Subedi;S. Summers;C. H. Sundkvist;Christina Synn;Amanuel F. Tadesse;Gregory P. Tapis;Kerri L. Tassin;Samantha Taylor;M. Teal;Ryan Teeter;M. Tharapos;Jochen C. Theis;Jack Thomas;K. Thompson;Todd A. Thornock;Wendy M. Tietz;Anthony M. Travalent;Brad S. Trinkle;J. Truelson;Michael C. Turner;Brandon Vagner;H. Vakilzadeh;Jesse van der Geest;Victor van Pelt;Scott D. Vandervelde;Jose Vega;Sandra C. Vera;Brigham Villanueva;N. Vincent;Martin Wagener;S. Walton;Rick C. Warne;Olena V. Watanabe;David Watson;M. Watson;J. Weber;T. Weirich;Ashley N. West;Amanda L. Wilford;Aaron B. Wilson;Brian Winrow;Timothy Winrow;Tasia S. Winrow;D. Wiseman;Annie L. Witte;B. D. Wood;Jessica Wood;Darryl J. Woolley;Nicole S. Wright;Juan Wu;Xiao;Dimitri Yatsenko;Courtney E. Yazzie;GL Young;C. Zhang;Aleksandra B. Zimmerman;E.N.W. Zoet研究方向: -- MeSH主题词: --
关键词: --
来源链接:pubmed详情页地址

文献摘要

ChatGPT, a language-learning model chatbot, has garnered considerable attention for its ability to respond to users’ questions. Using data from 14 countries and 186 institutions, we compare ChatGPT and student performance for 28,085 questions from accounting assessments and textbook test banks. As of January 2023, ChatGPT provides correct answers for 56.5 percent of questions and partially correct answers for an additional 9.4 percent of questions. When considering point values for questions, students significantly outperform ChatGPT with a 76.7 percent average on assessments compared to 47.5 percent for ChatGPT if no partial credit is awarded and 56.5 percent if partial credit is awarded. Still, ChatGPT performs better than the student average for 15.8 percent of assessments when we include partial credit. We provide evidence of how ChatGPT performs on different question types, accounting topics, class levels, open/closed assessments, and test bank questions. We also discuss implications for accounting education and research.
ChatGPT是一种语言学习模型聊天机器人,因其能够回答用户问题的能力而受到了相当多的关注。我们利用来自14个国家和186个机构的数据,针对会计评估和教材测试题库中的28085个问题,对ChatGPT和学生的表现进行了比较。截至2023年1月,ChatGPT对56.5%的问题提供了正确答案,对另外9.4%的问题提供了部分正确的答案。当考虑问题的分值时,如果不给予部分分数,学生在评估中的平均成绩(76.7%)显著优于ChatGPT(47.5%);如果给予部分分数,ChatGPT的成绩为56.5%。然而,当我们考虑部分分数时,ChatGPT在15.8%的评估中表现优于学生的平均水平。我们提供了ChatGPT在不同问题类型、会计主题、课程级别、开放式/封闭式评估以及测试题库问题上的表现证据。我们还讨论了其对会计教育和研究的影响。
参考文献(1)
被引文献(21)

数据更新时间:{{ references.updateTime }}

E.N.W. Zoet
通讯地址:
--
所属机构:
--
电子邮件地址:
--
免责声明免责声明
1、猫眼课题宝专注于为科研工作者提供省时、高效的文献资源检索和预览服务;
2、网站中的文献信息均来自公开、合规、透明的互联网文献查询网站,可以通过页面中的“来源链接”跳转数据网站。
3、在猫眼课题宝点击“求助全文”按钮,发布文献应助需求时求助者需要支付50喵币作为应助成功后的答谢给应助者,发送到用助者账户中。若文献求助失败支付的50喵币将退还至求助者账户中。所支付的喵币仅作为答谢,而不是作为文献的“购买”费用,平台也不从中收取任何费用,
4、特别提醒用户通过求助获得的文献原文仅用户个人学习使用,不得用于商业用途,否则一切风险由用户本人承担;
5、本平台尊重知识产权,如果权利所有者认为平台内容侵犯了其合法权益,可以通过本平台提供的版权投诉渠道提出投诉。一经核实,我们将立即采取措施删除/下架/断链等措施。
我已知晓