DSM-III-R PERSONALITY DISORDER & SUBSTANCE ABUSE

DSM-III-R 人格障碍

• 批准号: 3424044
• 负责人: MICHAEL OBOYLE
• 金额: $ 3.33万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 1989
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1989-09-30 至 1991-09-29
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/3424044
• 关键词: behavior prediction; diagnosis quality /standard; disease /disorder classification; drug addiction; human subject; interview; longitudinal human study; mental disorder diagnosis; personality disorders; personality tests; prognosis; questionnaires

Most DSM-III-R personality disorders do not have strong empiric support. In addition, objections have been raised concerning the categorical system of diagnosis employed in the DSM-III-R. While self rating scales have traditionally been used in personality assessment, structured interviews have been suggested as a means to enhance the reliability of DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses. While establishing the validity of such diagnoses is a formidable task, the prediction of treatment response has been suggested as validator of personality disorder diagnosis . The goals of the present study are: 1) to examine the correspondence between personality assessments based on DSM-III-R criteria with those obtained using a well established instrument based on a dimensional model of personality and: 2) to determine the reliability and relative prognostic utility of these personality assessments. Patients in a substance abuse program will be assessed using a structured interview and a self report questionnaire, both designed to yield DSM- III-R personality disorder diagnoses. They will also complete the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Addiction severity will be assessed using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI, McClellen et al, 1980). A six- month follow-up assessment will be obtained using the same instruments. The long-term objectives are to assess the reliability and validity of DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses, and to examine the postulated correspondence between the DSM-III-R personality disorder system and a well established dimensional model.

大多数DSM-III-R人格障碍都没有强大的经验支持。 此外，已经提出了关于分类的异议 DSM-III-R中采用的诊断系统。而自评级量表 传统上已被用于人格评估，结构化 已经建议采访以提高可靠性 DSM-III-R人格障碍诊断。在建立有效性的同时 这种诊断是一项艰巨的任务，预测治疗 已建议反应作为人格障碍的验证者 诊断 。本研究的目标是：1）检查 基于DSM-III-R的人格评估之间的对应关系 使用基于良好仪器获得的标准 个性的维度模型和：2）确定可靠性 这些人格评估的相对预后效用。 将使用结构化评估药物滥用计划中的患者 访谈和自我报告问卷，均旨在产生DSM- III-R人格障碍的诊断。他们还将完成Eysenck 个性问卷（EPQ）。成瘾的严重程度将被评估 使用成瘾的严重程度指数（ASI，McClellen等，1980）。六个 将使用相同的仪器获得月随访评估。 长期目标是评估 DSM-III-R人格障碍诊断并检查了假设 DSM-III-R人格障碍系统与A之间的对应关系 良好的维度模型。