Deviant Leaders: Factors that Facilitate and Inhibit Transgression Credit.

异常领导者：促进和抑制违规信用的因素。

• 批准号: 2114901
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Kent
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2018 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2114901
• 关键词: Deviant; Leaders; Factors; Facilitate; Inhibit

Three series of studies will use experimental designs with samples of 40 participants per condition recruited from the Research Participation Scheme and MTURK, using topics spanning politics, management, and sport. Novel measurement techniques such as behavioural decisions, emotion, personality, attitudinal and implicit measures will be included. The first study in each series is described here. In each series, additional studies (b/c) will follow up specific results to probe theory and explanation.Series 1: Three personality characteristics may affect TC. High need for cognitive closure (NFCC) promotes group centrism and preference for normative behaviour, but also attentiveness to member prototypicality2. Because leaders are highly prototypical3, it is predicted that NFCC promotes TC. Right wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are also likely to influence TC, but little attention has been paid to their effects in intragroup dynamics. RWA leads to harsher evaluations of people that threaten in-group cohesion4, suggesting deviant members and leaders may be evaluated similarly harshly. SDO is related to a preference for status hierarchies4 and thus may promote leniency for leaders, who hold more status than typical group members. Study 1a will use a 3 (personality construct) x 2 (transgressive leader vs. member) moderated regression study to assess the predictive power of NFCC, RWA, and SDO on favourability ratings.Series 2. NFCC can also be influenced by situational factors such as induced identity uncertainty3 5. As well as having a direct effect, NFCC may therefore also play a mediating role between identity uncertainty and TC. Study 2a will test this with a 2 (identity certainty threatened vs. not threatened) x 2 (deviant leader vs. member) design and will employ various measures of situational NFCC. Series 3. RWA and SDO may also be influenced by situational factors, particularly by the intergroup context. RWA and SDO are heightened by intergroup competition6 and, whereas NFCC should have a mediating role, RWA and SDO might moderate whether competition increases TC. Study 3a will use a 2 (high vs. low intergroup competition) x 2 (deviant leader vs. member) design and test the hypothesis that intergroup competition only results in TC among participants who are high in RWA or SDO.

三个系列研究将使用实验设计，每条从研究参与计划招募的条件和MTURK招募的40名参与者的样本，并使用涵盖政治，管理和体育的主题。将包括新颖的测量技术，例如行为决策，情感，个性，态度和隐式措施。这里描述了每个系列中的第一个研究。在每个系列中，其他研究（B/C）将跟踪探针理论和解释的特定结果。系列1：三个人格特征可能会影响TC。对认知封闭（NFCC）的高需求促进了群体中心主义和对规范行为的偏爱，但对成员原型性的关注2。由于领导者是高度典型的3，因此可以预测NFCC会促进TC。右翼威权主义（RWA）和社会优势取向（SDO）也可能会影响TC，但对它们在群体内动态的影响很少。 RWA导致对威胁小组内凝聚力的人们进行更严厉的评估4，这表明可能会类似地评估偏差的成员和领导者。 SDO与对状态层次结构的偏爱有关4，因此可能会促进与典型群体成员相比拥有更多地位的领导者的宽大处理。研究1A将使用3（人格结构）X 2（侵犯领导者与成员）调节回归研究来评估NFCC，RWA和SDO的预测能力。由于诱导的身份不确定性3.以及具有直接效应，因此NFCC也可能在身份不确定性和TC之间起介导作用。研究2a将以2（身份确定性威胁与未受到威胁的身份确定性）进行测试，x 2（异常领导者与成员）设计，并将采用各种情境NFCC措施。系列3。RWA和SDO也可能受到情境因素的影响，特别是组间环境。 RWA和SDO通过组间竞争增强了6，尽管NFCC应该具有中介作用，但RWA和SDO可能会适应竞争是否增加TC。研究3A将使用2（高与低组间竞争）X 2（差异领导者与成员）设计并测试以下假设：在RWA或SDO中，组间竞争仅在TC中导致TC。