SHOCK (not) horror

震惊（不是）恐怖

• 批准号: EP/J005657/1
• 负责人: Stephanie Glendinning
• 金额: $ 34.34万
• 依托单位: Newcastle University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2011 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP%2FJ005657%2F1
• 关键词: SHOCK; horror; SHOCK; horror

The project team propose that system shocks constitute opportunities to radically 'shift minds' by reevaluating the relationship between demand and provision of infrastructure. Shocks provide drivers to re-imagining the scale of resource use, particularly in terms of delivering core utilities, as we move into an era of resource scarcity. The SHOCK (not) HORROR project uniquely unpicks the potential for radical change through the allegory of medical trauma to challenge infrastructure stakeholders to move out of their comfort zone, challenge the current organization of infrastructure in silos, rethink the nature of shocks and devise new and transformative ways of thinking about infrastructure. Specifically it will develop a new concept of infrastructure resilience, both by using shocks as a way of both highlighting the interdependencies of existing infrastructure systems (identifying the weak points), and improving infrastructure by restoring it to a better state after the shock (rather than re-instating what was there before the shock). The project team is connected by the belief that the study of infrastructure shocks can help develop new holistic models of infrastructure. We approach infrastructure problems from very different discipline perspectives (civil engineering, design for sustainability and socio-technical systems research) but aim to build on this diversity to generate new and insightful outputs which will synthesise knowledge across these different fields of study.Our methodology is based on the use of narratives of trauma as a means to free up thinking about infrastructure 'traumas' and the opportunities they provide for radical re-shaping of the infrastructure. These will be used, together with a portfolio of case studies where trauma has occurred, to explore to what extent the 'window of opportunity' for change was recognised and/or utilised, and whether we can envisage methods to take the maximum advantage of similar situations in the future. The methodology is will use maps of socio-technical infrastructure systems of systems and develop of narratives of intervention points. It will have 5 stages: 1) Medical trauma as an allegory of infrastructure system shocks: We are going to develop the medical allegory using a range of qualitative methods, including document analysis and interviews with medical professionals from different cultural approaches (e.g. Western and Chinese medicine) and different forms of medical practice (e.g. GP consulting vs emergencies), to compile trauma storylines that have led to radical re-evaluations of either medical practice and/or personal ways of living2) Construction of maps of the socio-technological configuration of infrastructure systems: We are going to map the socio-technical configurations of infrastructure systems and the dynamics of change with reference to the literature of systems innovations and sustainability transitions. We will extend this framework by investigating it further through our storylines of systems shocks.3) Testing the allegory in real infrastructure systems and defining system intervention points: We are going to organize two day-long stakeholder events in which stakeholders will be invited to evaluate the accuracy of our infrastructure systems maps and debate the feasibility of intervention in the system intervention points defined according to a hierarchical scale.4) Development of a Framework to Maximise Learning from Infrastructure Systems Shocks: We are going to devise a series of experiments to understand the decisions required to maximize the window of opportunity provided by shocks to learn about the integration of infrastructure systems.5) Synthesis of the combined outputs into a long-term transformative agenda: We will use the combined outputs of the research to develop an agenda for transformative research, education and practice on integrated infrastructure. We will focus on developing a "shock tactics laboratory".

该项目团队建议系统震动构成了通过重新评估需求与提供基础设施之间的关系来从根本上“转移思想”的机会。冲击为驱动因素提供了重新想象资源使用规模的规模，尤其是在提供核心公用事业方面，我们进入了资源稀缺时代。震惊（非）恐怖项目独特地取消了通过医疗创伤寓言挑战利益相关者迁出其舒适区的宗教寓言的潜力，挑战了Silos中当前的基础设施组织，重新思考基础设施的本质，并设计了新的和变革性的思考基础架构的方式。具体而言，它将通过使用冲击作为一种既强调现有基础架构系统（识别弱点）的相互依赖性的方式来发展一个新的基础架构弹性概念，并通过将其恢复到震动后的更好状态（而不是重新确定在震惊之前的情况）来改善基础架构。项目团队通过相信基础设施冲击的研究可以帮助开发新的基础设施整体模型。我们从非常不同的纪律角度（土木工程，可持续性设计和社会技术系统研究）来解决基础设施问题，但旨在建立在这种多样性的基础上，以产生新的和有见地的成果，这些成果将在这些不同的研究领域中综合知识。您的方法论是基于创造性的叙事方式，以提供创造性的范围，以提供创造性的范围。 基础设施。这些将与发生创伤发生的案例研究一起使用，以探索在多大程度上识别和/或使用了“机会之窗”，以及我们是否可以设想我们是否可以设想将来可以最大程度地利用类似情况的最大优势。该方法将使用系统的社会技术基础设施系统的地图以及干预点叙事的发展。 It will have 5 stages: 1) Medical trauma as an allegory of infrastructure system shocks: We are going to develop the medical allegory using a range of qualitative methods, including document analysis and interviews with medical professionals from different cultural approaches (e.g. Western and Chinese medicine) and different forms of medical practice (e.g. GP consulting vs emergencies), to compile trauma storylines that have led to radical re-evaluations of either medical实践和/或个人生活方式2）基础设施系统的社会技术配置的地图构建：我们将根据系统创新和可持续性转变的文献来绘制基础架构系统的社会技术配置以及变化的动态。我们将通过我们的系统冲击的故事情节进一步研究该框架。3）测试在实际基础架构系统中的寓言并定义系统干预点：我们将邀请利益相关者组织为期两天框架以最大化基础架构系统的学习冲击：我们将设计一系列实验，以了解最大程度地减少冲击提供的机会窗口，以了解基础设施系统的整合。5）将组合的输出合成为长期的变革性投资组合：我们将在研究中进行研究，以进行研究，以进行研究，以进行研究，以进行研究，并进行了构成阶层的练习。我们将专注于开发“冲击战术实验室”。