2/2 Trauma Resuscitation with Group O Whole Blood or Products (TROOP)
2/2 使用 O 组全血或产品进行创伤复苏 (TROOP)
基本信息
- 批准号:10449778
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 65.38万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2022
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2022-08-05 至 2027-07-31
- 项目状态:未结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:Accident and Emergency departmentAdverse eventAlabamaAnnual ReportsBiometryBloodBlood PlateletsBlood TransfusionBlood VolumeBudgetsCase Report FormCessation of lifeClinicalClinical DataClinical ManagementClinical TrialsClinical Trials Data Monitoring CommitteesClinical effectivenessCollaborationsCollectionCommunicationCommunitiesComplementConflict of InterestCost Effectiveness AnalysisDataData CollectionData Coordinating CenterData ScienceData SetDevelopmentDocumentationElementsEligibility DeterminationEnrollmentEnsureErythrocytesEventExhibitsFundingGoalsGrantHealth SciencesHemorrhagic ShockHourHuman ResourcesInstitutional Review BoardsLeadershipLogisticsManualsMethodologyMonitorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteObservational StudyPatientsPhasePlasmaPoliciesPositioning AttributePrincipal InvestigatorProbabilityProceduresProtocols documentationPublicationsQuality ControlRandomized Clinical TrialsReportingResearchResourcesResuscitationRoleSafetyScheduleSecureSiteSpecific qualifier valueSystemTestingTexasTimeTimeLineTransfusionTraumaTrauma patientUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationUniversitiesValidationVotingWhole Bloodauthorityclinical centercompare effectivenesscomputerized data processingdata disseminationdata managementdesigneffectiveness evaluationelectronic dataelectronic data capture systemexperiencefollow-upimprovedinnovationmeetingsmembermortalityoperationorganizational structureprimary outcomerecruitremote monitoringsecondary outcomesevere injurystandard of caresymposiumtransfusion medicinetrauma centerstrial designweb siteworking group
项目摘要
PROJECT SUMMARY
In collaboration with the University of Alabama (UAB), we propose to conduct the five-year, “Trauma
Resuscitation with Group O Whole Blood Or Products” (TROOP) trial, a pragmatic, multicenter, phase III
randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of whole blood, compared with
component blood therapy in trauma patients predicted to require large volume blood transfusions.
The primary hypothesis of the TROOP trial is that the group treated with whole blood will exhibit no worse
mortality and/or lower mortality compared to component therapy at 6 hours. The rationale for this trial is that
although the current standard of care in trauma transfusion is the balanced administration of equal numbers of
units of blood components (packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets), 123 U.S. trauma centers currently
use LTOWB for trauma resuscitation. Thus, a renewed approach to blood transfusion therapy in trauma is to
use whole blood from the outset. Compared with component therapy, transfusion with whole blood offers several
logistical and potentially clinical advantages; however, there are only a small number of observational studies
that have compared the strategies. The specific aims of the TROOP trial clinical coordinating center (CCC)
application submitted by UAB are to: (1) determine the effectiveness of whole blood versus component therapy
at 6 hours in critically injured patients; and 2) evaluate the safety of whole blood compared to component therapy
by evaluating longer term endpoints: 24 hours, 30 days, and major complications.
To assess these specific aims, the trial uses a highly innovative, Bayesian, group-sequential, combined non-
inferiority/superiority design, and pre-planned cost-effectiveness analysis. The trial has been designed in
collaboration with NHLBI’s Innovative Clinical Trials Resource, funded by a U34 Planning Grant (U34HL148472).
The accompanying CCC application from UAB describes the details of the clinical background and rationale for
the study, eligibility criteria, treatment and follow-up procedures, and the organizational structure of TROOP.
The Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials in the Department of Biostatistics and Data Science at the University
of Texas Health Science Center at Houston will serve as the statistical and data coordination center (DCC) for
the TROOP Trial. This DCC application describes the TROOP trial aims, expertise of the DCC, its role in the
TROOP trial, details of data processing and management, and details of the Bayesian statistical design, analysis
plan, and potential pitfalls.
项目概要
我们与阿拉巴马大学 (UAB) 合作,建议开展为期五年的“创伤
使用 O 组全血或产品进行复苏”(TROOP)试验,一项务实的、多中心的 III 期试验
评估全血临床有效性和安全性的随机临床试验,与
预计需要大量输血的创伤患者的成分血液治疗。
TROOP 试验的主要假设是,接受全血治疗的组不会表现出更差的情况
与 6 小时的成分治疗相比,死亡率和/或更低的死亡率 本试验的基本原理是:
尽管目前创伤输血的护理标准是均衡管理同等数量的输血
血液成分单位(浓缩红细胞、血浆和血小板),目前有 123 个美国创伤中心
使用 LTOWB 进行创伤复苏 因此,创伤输血治疗的新方法是
从一开始就使用全血 与成分疗法相比,输注全血具有多种优势。
后勤和潜在的临床优势;然而,只有少量的观察性研究
TROOP 试验临床协调中心 (CCC) 的具体目标
UAB 提交的申请旨在: (1) 确定全血与成分疗法的有效性
在重伤患者中 6 小时;2) 评估全血与成分疗法相比的安全性
通过评估长期终点:24 小时、30 天和主要并发症。
为了评估这些具体目标,该试验使用了高度创新的贝叶斯、组序、组合非
劣效/优效设计以及预先计划的成本效益分析。
与 NHLBI 的创新临床试验资源合作,该资源由 U34 规划补助金 (U34HL148472) 资助。
UAB 随附的 CCC 申请描述了临床背景和基本原理的详细信息
研究、标准资格、治疗和随访程序以及 TROOP 的组织结构。
大学生物统计与数据科学系临床试验协调中心
位于休斯顿的德克萨斯健康科学中心将作为统计和数据协调中心(DCC)
该 DCC 申请描述了 TROOP 试验的目的、DCC 的专业知识及其在该试验中的作用。
TROOP试验,数据处理和管理的细节,以及贝叶斯统计设计、分析的细节
计划和潜在的陷阱。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Stacia DeSantis其他文献
Stacia DeSantis的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Stacia DeSantis', 18)}}的其他基金
2/2 Trauma Resuscitation with Group O Whole Blood or Products (TROOP)
2/2 使用 O 组全血或产品进行创伤复苏 (TROOP)
- 批准号:
10707055 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Aiding Decision-Making and Trial Design using Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis
使用多元网络元分析辅助决策和试验设计
- 批准号:
9473144 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Aiding Decision-Making and Trial Design using Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis
使用多元网络荟萃分析辅助决策和试验设计
- 批准号:
9243340 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
相似国自然基金
基于中医舌诊参数及糖脂代谢指标的PCI术后再发心血管不良事件时间序列预测模型研究
- 批准号:82374336
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:49 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
基于效用错位视角的医疗不良事件管理政策的引导体系优化研究
- 批准号:72304012
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
基于人工智能和多模态信息预测复杂下肢动脉病变术后不良事件的算法机制研究
- 批准号:82370499
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:49 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
基于几何形态与生物力学分析预测腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗术后锚定区相关不良事件
- 批准号:82300542
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
GNB3联合光谱CT冠周脂肪组学预警ACS后心血管不良事件的模型构建
- 批准号:82302186
- 批准年份:2023
- 资助金额:30 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
相似海外基金
Prospective Effects of Early Life Stress and Protective Factors on Vascular Function and Inflammation in Young Adulthood
早期生活压力和保护因素对青年期血管功能和炎症的前瞻性影响
- 批准号:
10555128 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Eligibility criteria design for Alzheimer's trials with real-world data and explainable AI
利用真实数据和可解释的人工智能设计阿尔茨海默病试验的资格标准
- 批准号:
10608470 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Feasibility and Safety of a Portable Exoskeleton to Improve Mobility in Parkinson’s Disease
便携式外骨骼改善帕金森病患者活动能力的可行性和安全性
- 批准号:
10702193 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Comparison of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccines in Lung Allograft Recipients
同种异体肺移植受者中高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗的比较
- 批准号:
10405753 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别:
Comparison of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccines in Lung Allograft Recipients
同种异体肺移植受者中高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗的比较
- 批准号:
10576411 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 65.38万 - 项目类别: