International transfer of the workfare programs-the United Kingdome and Canada from the United States-

工作福利计划的国际转移 - 从美国到英国和加拿大 -

基本信息

批准号：
15530189
负责人：
ARAI Mitsuyoshi
金额：
$ 1.79万
依托单位：
Saitama University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15530189/
关键词：
workfare policy welfare to work policy work first approach human capital development approach self-support of welfare leaver family Ontario Works New Deal for Young People New Labour 勤労福祉ウィスコンシン・モデル勤労最優先(労働力化重視)手法福祉離脱世帯の経済的自立カナ

项目摘要

My research result is the following points. First, it was clarified that the workfare was a global policy of no limit to the United States, and containing Scandinavia nations that were an advanced welfare states. Secondarily, contents of the American type workfare policy were analyzed based on the statistical data, and the result and the limit were clarified. Thirdly, Canada faced the great difficulty politically and socially though it tried to imitate the welfare reform of the United States and to introduce the workfare policy. Fourthly, though Britain imitates the workfare policy of the United States and other nations and executed the New Deal, it was very different from the United States in the content and the point of management etc. Finally, the workfare policy composed a part of the irreversible structural reforms that globalism had been compelling to every country in the world. Moreover, this research pointed out that the object of the workfare policy was different in three coun … More tries of Britain, United States and Canada. For instance, the target of the American workfare policy was the Aid for Families with Dependent Children recipient thought to be the undeserving poor, that is, single mother family. On the other hand, the welfare recipient like the aged, the blind and a handicapped person are regarded as the deserving poor, and did not become the target of the workfare policy, and the qualification to be a welfare recipient had been secured as an entitlement. In other words, though the United States was certainly obligating a tough requirement like the lifelong time limit benefit, the compulsory participation, and the sanction, its target had been limited to entirely single mother. Therefore, it cannot necessarily be said that the workfare policy of the United States is tougher than that of Britain and Canada where the target is wider. Though the number of welfare recipients in the United States, Britain, and Canada decreased by introducing the workfare policy, it was not able to help the self-support of the welfare leaver, increased a temporary employment and part-time employment, and made labor market unstable. Less

我的研究结果有以下几点：首先，明确了工作福利政策是一项不受美国限制的全球性政策，其中包括作为先进福利国家的斯堪的纳维亚国家；其次，分析了美国式工作福利政策的内容。第三，加拿大效仿美国的福利改革，推出工作福利政策，但在政治和社会上却面临着巨大的困难。美国和其他国家的工作福利政策以及新政的实施，在内容和管理的角度等方面都与美国有很大不同。最后，工作福利政策构成了全球化所带来的不可逆转的结构性改革的一部分。此外，这项研究指出，英国、美国和加拿大三个国家的工作福利政策的目标是不同的，例如美国的工作福利政策的目标是援助。对于有受抚养子女的家庭，接受者认为另一方面，老年人、盲人、残疾人等福利领取者则被视为应有贫困人口，并没有成为工薪政策的对象。换言之，美国虽然规定了终身福利、强制参与、制裁等严格要求，但其目标却仅限于单一。母亲。因此，虽然美国、英国和加拿大因实行工作福利政策而减少了领取福利的人数，但并不能说美国的工作福利政策比目标更广泛的英国和加拿大更严格。，它无法帮助福利离开者的自给自足，增加了临时就业和兼职就业，并导致劳动力市场不稳定。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（5）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

アメリカ型勤労福祉制度の成果と限界

美国式劳工福利制度的成就与局限性

DOI：
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
経済学研究(九州大学経済学会) 第69巻3.4合併号
影响因子：
0
作者：
Ueno;Hiroshi;宮下國生;Eiichi Tomiura;宮下國生;塩原俊彦;上野宏;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;宮下國生;Tomiura Eiichi;Katayama Seiichi;Tomiura Eiichi;新井光吉
通讯作者：
新井光吉

勤労福祉政策の国際展開-アメリカからイギリス、カナダへ-

劳工福利政策的国际发展——从美国到英国和加拿大——

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
0
作者：
Ueno;Hiroshi;宮下國生;Eiichi Tomiura;宮下國生;塩原俊彦;上野宏;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;Kunio Miyashita;宮下國生;宮下國生;Tomiura Eiichi;Katayama Seiichi;Tomiura Eiichi;新井光吉;宮下國生;T.Shiobara;Aral Mitsuyoshi;Seiichi Katayama;塩原俊彦;Kunio Miyashita;上野宏;Katayama Seiichi;新井光吉
通讯作者：
新井光吉

Result and limit of American workfare

美国工作福利的结果及限额