Several Aspects of Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Sextus Empiricus

《塞克斯图斯·经验》中皮浪怀疑论的几个方面

基本信息

批准号：
05801001
负责人：
KANAYAMA Yasuhira
金额：
$ 1.22万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1993
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1993 至 1995
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

I could obtain the following results through my research from 1993 to 1995.1.The attitude of Pyrrhonian skeptics to value reason and rationality in their search for truth does not conflict with their doubt on the existence of reason. They admit reason in the sense that they actually employ what is generally called reason in their philosophical investigation, while they disapprove the commitment of dogmatists to unclear things in theorizing about reason. Thus we can see here one of the central tenets of ancient skepticism, i.e., the distinction between the standard of truth and the standard of action.2.Although they regard happiness in the form of tranquility as their end, this does not constitute dogma on their part, because the supposition concerning tranquility is one of those suppositions that are acceptable in their daily life, and when it is put to the test of skeptical doubt, it turns out that it is nothing but an appearance.3.Although some appearances they sanction include some element of belief from the view point of today's epistemology, they are completely free from belief element as far as Pyrrhonian standopint is concerned.4.In spite of some testimony that seems to suggest that in advocating skepticism Pyrrho started from some dogma on the world, I don't think it is right to place too much emphasis on the difference of later Pyrrhonism from Pyrrho's philosophy. In my view Pyrrho didn't have any dogma, and there is much more in common between Pyrrho's skepticism and later Pyrrhonism than has been usually recognized.5.I have made a Japanese version of the collection of ancient testimonies on Pyrrho.

我可以通过从1993年到1995年的研究来获得以下结果。1。pyrrhonian怀疑者在寻找真理时重视理性和合理性的态度并不与他们对理性存在的疑问相抵触。他们承认理由是从某种意义上说，他们实际上在哲学调查中采用了通常所谓的理性，而他们不赞成教条主义者在理论上对理论不清楚事物的承诺。因此，我们可以在这里看到古代怀疑主义的中心宗旨之一，即真理标准和行动标准之间的区别。他们的部分，因为关于宁静的假设是日常生活中可以接受的假设之一，当它被审视持怀疑态度的怀疑时，事实证明它只是外观从今天的认识论的角度来看，制裁包括一些信仰元素，就pyrrhonian standopint而言，它们完全没有信仰元素。4。在某些证词中似乎暗示，在提倡怀疑主义时，pyrrho是从某种教条开始的。世界，我认为过分强调后来的pyrhonism与Pyrrho哲学的差异是不正确的。在我看来，pyrrho没有任何教条，在pyrrho的怀疑和后来的pyrrhonism之间，比通常认识到的是更多的共同点。5.i我已经在Pyrrho上制作了日本版本的古代证词。