The Roman fortlet on the "Blöskopf" near Bad Ems - a contribution to early imperial occupation at the lower Lahn region

巴德埃姆斯附近“Blöskopf”上的罗马堡垒 - 对早期帝国占领拉恩下游地区的贡献

• 批准号: 431035150
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Markus Scholz
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Abteilung II: Archäologie, Geschichte d römischen Provinzen sowie Archäologie v Münze, Geld u v Wirtschaft i d Antike
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2018-12-31 至 2020-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/431035150?language=en
• 关键词: Roman; fortlet; Bl; skopf; near

The lower Lahn region and its significance for the Roman-Germanic relations in the early imperial period is conditioned by the Roman military camps near Lahnstein, Limburg, Oberbrechen and Dorlar as well as Waldgirmes, a city in statu nascendi. They are all dated to the late Republican up to late Augustean period. When in 2016 on the mountain spur "Ehrlich" above Bad Ems an timber-earth fort of approx. 8 acre size was discovered it seemed that another Augustan camp had been found. However, excavations carried out by the Goethe-University 2017-18 proved that it has to be dated between 40 and 70 AD.This discovery sheds new light on another well-known monument. For more than 100 years, the approx. 0.8 ha large site on the Blöskopf near Bad Ems confined by a rectangular ditch and wall system was considered to be a Roman blast furnace. Without concrete evidence, it was placed in the context of the nearby passing Upper German Limes and dated to the period around 200 AD. A sondage in 2008 and its examination refute this. Rather, it is a small fortlet-like complex, also from around 40-70 AD. This surprising insight raises questions. A pre-Flavian fortlet on the right bank of the Rhine is at present unprecedented. Unusual for this early period is also the existence of an interior building on stonewall foundations. Which function(s) did the camp have, which the stone construction in its interior? In this context it is also necessary to clarify the dating and function of an adjacent linear entrenchment (a ditch-wall-system) previously unknown, but now visible in the LiDAR scan, by which the Blöskopf pass was blocked to the east and thus also the access to the Lahn was controllable. Are these facilities related to Roman mining activities that have been demonstrated in the region and mentioned by Tacitus? What role did the large camp on the "Ehrlich" 1.5 km away play in this? Did both military sites fall victim to the same fate, as final layers of burned material seem to suggest?If the layout on the Blöskopf could be characterized more precisely, the previously unknown Claudian-Neronic occupation phase of the lower Lahn region could be better classified and interpreted. As a cooperation of the Goethe-University Frankfurt and the GDKE Koblenz, three targeted areas are to be excavated during a six-week campaign. Furthermore, geochemical pottery analysis points to previously unknown connections to military sites in the Rhine-Main area of the same period.

拉恩下游地区及其在帝国早期对罗马-日耳曼关系的重要性取决于兰施泰因、林堡、奥伯布雷兴和多拉尔附近的罗马军营，以及刚刚起步的城市瓦尔德吉尔梅斯。共和国晚期至奥古斯都时期晚期，2016 年，在巴特埃姆斯上方的山刺“埃利希”上，建造了一座占地约 8 英亩的木土堡垒。发现了另一个奥古斯都营地，但歌德大学 2017-18 年进行的发掘证明它的年代必须在公元 40 年至 70 年之间。这一发现为另一个著名的纪念碑提供了新的线索。 100 多年来，巴特埃姆斯 (Bad Ems) 附近的 Blöskopf 地区被矩形沟渠和围墙系统包围的约 0.8 公顷的大片土地被认为是罗马时期的爆炸物。在没有具体证据的情况下，它被放置在附近经过的上德国莱姆的背景下，其历史可以追溯到公元 200 年左右。2008 年的一项调查也驳斥了这一点。大约公元 40 至 70 年，这一令人惊讶的发现引发了人们的疑问，莱茵河右岸的一座前弗拉维堡垒在这个早期时期的存在也是史无前例的。石墙基础。营地有哪些功能，其内部的石头建筑有哪些？在这种情况下，还有必要澄清以前未知的相邻线性壕沟（沟墙系统）的年代和功能，但现在在激光雷达扫描中可见，布洛斯科普夫山口被封锁在东部，因此通往拉恩河的通道也是可控的，这些设施是否与塔西佗在该地区展示的罗马采矿活动有关？角色1.5 公里外的“埃利希”上的大型营地是否也在其中发挥作用？正如最后几层烧毁的材料似乎表明的那样，两个军事基地都遭受了同样的命运吗？如果可以更准确地描述布洛斯科普夫的布局，那么法兰克福歌德大学和科布伦茨 GDKE 合作，对拉恩下游地区先前未知的克劳迪安-尼罗尼克占领阶段进行了更好的分类和解释，期间将挖掘三个目标区域。此外，地球化学陶器分析表明，该遗址与同一时期莱茵-美因地区的军事遗址有先前未知的联系。