Life Cycle Locational Choices, Voting, and Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Estimation

生命周期选址、投票和财政联邦制：理论和估计

• 批准号: 0958705
• 负责人: Dennis Epple
• 金额: $ 44.36万
• 依托单位: Carnegie-Mellon University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2010-03-15 至 2013-02-28
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0958705&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Life; Cycle; Locational; Choices; Voting

Objective: Extensive research has established that school quality is a key factor influencing households' choices of where to reside within a metropolitan area and that housing price premiums prevail for neighborhoods with public schools that have high-achieving students. Research to date has focused largely on comparisons across local municipalities and school districts at a given point in time. Our research will extend this analysis to study how household residential location decisions vary over the life cycle. It is natural to expect that households will prefer locations with good quality public schools when they have school-age children while preferring locations with lower housing prices and lower quality public schools when their children have left school. Household preferences for types of public services can also be expected to change over the life cycle, with young households valuing education and older households placing greater value on social services. Older households may also favor lower taxes in preference to expenditures for education. Our research will study the dynamics of location over the life cycle and the associated potential for a generational divide about local tax and expenditure policies within communities. We have already begun research on this topic. Our proposed work will advance the agenda we have begun. Intellectual merit: First, we will incorporate variation in family size, home ownership, and preferences. Incorporating variation in family size will permit us to contrast life cycle housing consumption and location choices of households with differing numbers of children. Incorporating home ownership will permit study of the extent to which concerns for capital gains and losses induce owner occupants who do not have children ("empty nesters" and young households without children) to support spending for education that increases property values. Incorporating preference variation will permit us to account for factors such as differences in the extent to which attachments to friends, neighbors, and familiar surroundings influence decisions about whether to relocate over the life cycle. Second, we will explore the implications of public provision of different types of goods for voting, household sorting across communities, and life cycle mobility patterns. Third, we will assemble a new data set to study differences in demographic composition across communities, changes in community demographic composition over time, and changes in tax and expenditure patterns. Broader impact: There are a number of policy issues that can be addressed with our proposed research. Important issues in education reform include the study of alternative school choice plans, the effect of expenditure equalization programs, and the competitiveness of large urban school districts. We also plan to evaluate housing market policies such as programs that are aimed at increasing housing ownership among lower income households or relocation subsidies similar to those used in "moving to opportunity" programs. We will study implications of an aging U.S. population for household relocation decisions, the composition of communities, the expenditure patterns of communities, and access to economic opportunities.

目标：广泛的研究表明，学校质量是影响家庭选择在大都市地区居住的关键因素，并且在拥有公立学校且拥有成绩优异的学生的社区中，房价溢价普遍存在。 迄今为止的研究主要集中在特定时间点上当地市政当局和学区之间的比较。我们的研究将扩展这种分析，以研究家庭居住位置决策在生命周期中如何变化。 很自然地，当家庭有学龄儿童时，他们会更喜欢优质公立学校的地点，而当他们的孩子离开学校时，他们会更喜欢房价较低和质量较低的公立学校的地点。 预计家庭对公共服务类型的偏好也会在生命周期中发生变化，年轻家庭更看重教育，而老年家庭更看重社会服务。 老年家庭也可能倾向于降低税收而不是教育支出。我们的研究将研究生命周期中位置的动态以及社区内地方税收和支出政策代沟的相关潜力。 我们已经开始对此主题的研究。我们提议的工作将推进我们已经开始的议程。智力优势：首先，我们将考虑家庭规模、房屋所有权和偏好的差​​异。 考虑到家庭规模的差异，我们可以对比具有不同儿童数量的家庭的生命周期住房消费和地点选择。 将房屋所有权纳入其中将有助于研究对资本收益和损失的担忧在多大程度上促使没有孩子的业主（“空巢老人”和没有孩子的年轻家庭）支持增加财产价值的教育支出。 纳入偏好变化将使我们能够考虑一些因素，例如对朋友、邻居和熟悉环境的依恋在多大程度上影响是否在生命周期中搬迁的决定。 其次，我们将探讨公共提供不同类型商品对投票、跨社区的家庭分类以及生命周期流动模式的影响。 第三，我们将收集一个新的数据集来研究不同社区人口构成的差异、社区人口构成随时间的变化以及税收和支出模式的变化。更广泛的影响：我们提出的研究可以解决许多政策问题。 教育改革的重要问题包括替代择校计划的研究、支出均等计划的效果以及大城市学区的竞争力。 我们还计划评估住房市场政策，例如旨在增加低收入家庭住房拥有量的计划或类似于“搬迁机会”计划中使用的搬迁补贴。 我们将研究美国人口老龄化对家庭搬迁决策、社区组成、社区支出模式以及获得经济机会的影响。